Hi Everyone, It seems that Mailchannels no longer manages abuse, spam, scams and criminal activity and seems to have become a service provider to criminal syndicates and other low life, nefarious and scum baggerry (does scum baggerry have two G's and two R's? or is scum baggery even a word?) They are not a "free" provider like @google (which now, recently and of late again seems to be accepting abuse complaints at abuse@google.com) Why is it that the more scummy an org becomes, the larger they seem to grow? I am thinking of names like sendgrid, for example. the more scummy the org becomes the larger they become? Maybe I am just 'late' to see the connection and the "ESP's" already know that, which I am now only noticing. The "ESP's" have this layer or veneer of "decency" and we do no evil, yet, practically, they do evil and it now seems that the more evil they are, while pretending to be sheep, the larger they grow. at the risk of seeming more ranty than shary, I also wonder why Google decided to start managing abuse again via email? I was so surprised a few weeks ago when abuse@google started working again... (does anyone know why?) In closing, has anyone else noticed the link between more scummy and economic growth? And the 'better' the decency veneer, like good abuse response (but no action) etc. etc. the larger the org grows? Andre