On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:00:10 -0400 David Collier-Brown via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:

On 2019-09-19 11:11 p.m., William Park via talk wrote:

...

I just tried kernel 5.3.0, and it's noticeably faster in opening windows. Not sure about overall throughput, though. I'd be interested in how quick it is in unblocking processes who just got I/O. I have servers doing arrays of heavily parallel network requests who race each other to get back, but /then / compete to get a core to service them. --dave

Please do accept my apology in advance, I do not mean or intend to hijack an existing thread, but I have noticed something interesting in the email you just sent to the list, so I have started a new thread... :) Your sent email, came in marked as SPAM, and I wondered why... yes, it is from Google, who sends a lot of spam, scams etc. but that alone should not get it marked as spam... So, I looked and it is so interesting... (maybe I need a life :) ) Dave, in the headers you literally have three email addresses: Relayed For: <davec-b@rogers.com> - No SPF / Anti Forgery Cc:<davecb.42@gmail.com> - Which is currently a -> ~all Reply-To: davecb@spamcop.net and your SpamCop receive only addy, also a -> ~all Which is why your relay is scored additional, as this is also what spammers do very frequently (They use (rather abuse) @gmail with a reply to of @outlook.com, etc) It is also interesting, that Google, probably in the interests of becoming a better netizen?, has again started including relay headers, again, after not including same for a long while... Anyway, long winded, but here is the question: Do you not find many fake sent from and backscatter issues to your @rogers.com? If yes, why even still use it in your Thunderbird config? Andre