
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere? Thanks, Kare

A pair of David Clark's off of Kijiji? https://www.kijiji.ca/b-gta-greater-toronto-area/david-clark/k0l1700272?rb=true&dc=true Apparently these are what pilots use, so might be worth a try? On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:34 PM Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere? Thanks, Kare
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Interesting idea. Actually these are the headphones I use with my reading edge, for my computer and reading. I might have found a JvC prospect, still seeking specifications. On Tue, 11 Jan 2022, Gron Arthur via talk wrote:
A pair of David Clark's off of Kijiji? https://www.kijiji.ca/b-gta-greater-toronto-area/david-clark/k0l1700272?rb=true&dc=true Apparently these are what pilots use, so might be worth a try?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:34 PM Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere? Thanks, Kare
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 09:02:23PM -0500, Gron Arthur via talk wrote:
A pair of David Clark's off of Kijiji? https://www.kijiji.ca/b-gta-greater-toronto-area/david-clark/k0l1700272?rb=true&dc=true Apparently these are what pilots use, so might be worth a try?
The impedance is way too high for normal audio use. And they have a microphone too. They run around 300Ω versus about 30Ω for consumer headphones. -- Len Sorensen

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere?
I was going to suggest checking canada computers, but their filters are awful too. Can only filter by store, brand and price. Not very helpful. They certainly have a number of plain wired headphones but finding them could certainly be easier. Specifications for some are at least pretty detailed. -- Len Sorensen

Actually, if I can search by brand it would help. For example, there seems to be a JvC series that replaced the one I am using right now...for one working ear at least. I have a soft spot for Sony as well, with the spec details what I need most and am not finding. Site the obvious? Kare On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere?
I was going to suggest checking canada computers, but their filters are awful too. Can only filter by store, brand and price. Not very helpful.
They certainly have a number of plain wired headphones but finding them could certainly be easier. Specifications for some are at least pretty detailed.
-- Len Sorensen

Have you tried trouble shooting your existing JVC headphones? Perhaps only the audio jack has broken. Most traditional headphones are very robust, with their cable easily replaceable. With no microphone, there's only 3 cables. Of course if the ear piece foam or the metal connector between the two ears is broken, then you have no choice but to replace it. Don On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 19:45, Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
Actually, if I can search by brand it would help. For example, there seems to be a JvC series that replaced the one I am using right now...for one working ear at least. I have a soft spot for Sony as well, with the spec details what I need most and am not finding. Site the obvious? Kare
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere?
I was going to suggest checking canada computers, but their filters are awful too. Can only filter by store, brand and price. Not very helpful.
They certainly have a number of plain wired headphones but finding them could certainly be easier. Specifications for some are at least pretty detailed.
-- Len Sorensen
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Fine question. I actually took this pair previously to ring audio, because of how this pair is constructed reaching wires is hard, save for the tip. The repair sort of worked around that issue, with my imagining the work has come undone. If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x. They have been discontinued for some time now, but once in a while I find a pair...which reminds me to try newegg. Kare On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Don Tai wrote:
Have you tried trouble shooting your existing JVC headphones? Perhaps only the audio jack has broken. Most traditional headphones are very robust, with their cable easily replaceable. With no microphone, there's only 3 cables. Of course if the ear piece foam or the metal connector between the two ears is broken, then you have no choice but to replace it.
Don
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 19:45, Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
Actually, if I can search by brand it would help. For example, there seems to be a JvC series that replaced the one I am using right now...for one working ear at least. I have a soft spot for Sony as well, with the spec details what I need most and am not finding. Site the obvious? Kare
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:34:39PM -0500, Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi folks, or more specifically, a local store site where I can shop by details? Granted, some of this is tied to poor website design and accessibility. but I need to filter out what I do not need to reach what I do need, Regular wired headphones with a set of technical specifications. not bluetooth, not noise canceling, no microphone etc. Honestly, to avoid this issue I have been finding the same pair of JVC ones which, because they are well built, last a couple of years or more, smiles. To clear out the obvious best buy's site is no longer a possibility filter wise, and I cannot even get past the "are you human" thing at Walmart.ca, which has no way to answer it inclusively. Hoping to visit a place to pick up, rather than have to get them delivered..my office remains closed. Any ideas, even if only to narrow down specifics I can then ask about elsewhere?
I was going to suggest checking canada computers, but their filters are awful too. Can only filter by store, brand and price. Not very helpful.
They certainly have a number of plain wired headphones but finding them could certainly be easier. Specifications for some are at least pretty detailed.
-- Len Sorensen
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x. Thanks.
From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like mine. But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might find them useful.
Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means that there are a lot to choose from. There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a reader (as I understand it). I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very individual thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment) - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly] - 5.57 ounces - button controls (what do they control?) - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be very short] Do you use the buttons? What for? I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find over-ear very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a minority. Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room ("closed")? I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that even these get uncomfortable after a while. My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of soft tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from China. I have, for example: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. There are many other brands that are likely fine. There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient if you have Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert analog to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them.

Hi there, Fine and interesting list. To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no, not just because of the sense of position, but because I have something talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the background. As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking personally. I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes with the machine. The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones though is A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver units...oh and input power. a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me dizzy..literary. And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my reading edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or whatever. It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set once I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well. Goodness but I miss radio shack. Kare On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org>
| If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x.
Thanks.
From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like mine. But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might find them useful.
Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means that there are a lot to choose from.
There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a reader (as I understand it).
I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very individual thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs!
Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones:
- closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment)
- over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly]
- 5.57 ounces
- button controls (what do they control?)
- 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be very short]
Do you use the buttons? What for?
I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find over-ear very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a minority.
Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room ("closed")? I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful.
Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that even these get uncomfortable after a while.
My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of soft tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from China. I have, for example: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. There are many other brands that are likely fine. There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi".
TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient if you have Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert analog to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them.
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi there, Fine and interesting list. To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no, not just because of the sense of position, but because I have something talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the background. As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking personally. I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes with the machine. The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones though is A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver units...oh and input power. a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me dizzy..literary. And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my reading edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or whatever. It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set once I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well. Goodness but I miss radio shack. Kare
Greetings Karen, I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else. The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(. Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all have something good in that price point to my knowledge. As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people. And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an actual amp. Take care, Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org>
| If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x.
Thanks.
From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like mine. But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might find them useful.
Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means that there are a lot to choose from.
There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a reader (as I understand it).
I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very individual thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs!
Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones:
- closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment)
- over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly]
- 5.57 ounces
- button controls (what do they control?)
- 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be very short]
Do you use the buttons? What for?
I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find over-ear very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a minority.
Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room ("closed")? I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful.
Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that even these get uncomfortable after a while.
My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of soft tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from China. I have, for example: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. There are many other brands that are likely fine. There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi".
TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient if you have Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert analog to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them.
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Hi there, You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back actually means. to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is my preference. are closed back those behind your head then? I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even with no amp involved. Kare On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi there, Fine and interesting list. To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no, not just because of the sense of position, but because I have something talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the background. As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking personally. I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes with the machine. The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones though is A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver units...oh and input power. a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me dizzy..literary. And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my reading edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or whatever. It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set once I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well. Goodness but I miss radio shack. Kare
Greetings Karen, I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else.
The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(. Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all have something good in that price point to my knowledge.
As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people. And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an actual amp.
Take care, Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org>
| If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x.
Thanks.
From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like mine. But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might find them useful.
Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means that there are a lot to choose from.
There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a reader (as I understand it).
I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very individual thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs!
Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones:
- closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment)
- over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly]
- 5.57 ounces
- button controls (what do they control?)
- 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be very short]
Do you use the buttons? What for?
I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find over-ear very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a minority.
Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room ("closed")? I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful.
Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that even these get uncomfortable after a while.
My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of soft tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from China. I have, for example: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. There are many other brands that are likely fine. There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi".
TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient if you have Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert analog to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them.
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi there, You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back actually means. to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is my preference. are closed back those behind your head then? I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even with no amp involved. Kare
Karen, Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of the ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage is one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually breathe. Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms if your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem for IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory. Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi there, Fine and interesting list. To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no, not just because of the sense of position, but because I have something talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the background. As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking personally. I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes with the machine. The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones though is A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver units...oh and input power. a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me dizzy..literary. And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my reading edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or whatever. It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set once I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well. Goodness but I miss radio shack. Kare
Greetings Karen, I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else.
The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(. Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all have something good in that price point to my knowledge.
As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people. And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an actual amp.
Take care, Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x. Thanks. From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like mine. But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might find them useful.
Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> that > there are a lot to choose from.
There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a reader (as I understand it). I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very individual thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment) - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly] - 5.57 ounces - button controls (what do they control?) - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be very short] Do you use the buttons? What for? I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find over-ear very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a minority. Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room ("closed")? I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that even these get uncomfortable after a while. My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of soft tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from China. I have, for example: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. There are many other brands that are likely fine. There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient if you > have Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert analog to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. --- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple models for comparison across features: https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so far. Erica ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi there,
You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back
actually means.
to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is my
preference. are closed back those behind your head then?
I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even with
no amp involved.
Kare
Karen,
Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of the
ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You
don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with
closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage is
one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually breathe.
Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms if
your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem for
IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones
actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory.
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi there,
Fine and interesting list.
To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no,
not just because of the sense of position, but because I have
something
talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone
ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the
background.
As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many
years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking
personally.
I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put
pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes
with the machine.
The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones
though is
A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver
units...oh and input power.
a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me
dizzy..literary.
And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my
reading
edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or
whatever.
It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair.
Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set
once
I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well.
Goodness but I miss radio shack.
Kare
Greetings Karen,
I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense
are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was
stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else.
The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way
to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to
standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players
from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(.
Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all
have something good in that price point to my knowledge.
As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people.
And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an
actual amp.
Take care,
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org
| If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x.
Thanks.
From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like
mine.
But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might
find them
useful.
> Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically > > interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means > > that > there > > are a lot to choose from.
There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be
honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a
reader
(as I understand it).
I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very
individual
thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs!
Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones:
- closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment) - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly] - 5.57 ounces - button controls (what do they control?) - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be
very short]
Do you use the buttons? What for?
I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to
clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find
over-ear
very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a
minority.
Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room
("closed")?
I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful.
Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are
circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the
room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads
(but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that
even these get uncomfortable after a while.
My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of
soft
tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from
China.
I have, for example:
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html
Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less.
There are many other brands that are likely fine.
There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi".
TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient
if you > have
Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert
analog
to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them.
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list >
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

On Jan 14, 2022, at 08:24, Erica Peterson via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
(2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so far. It is normal and expected for ear cushions to wear out over time. This is a considerations that I have when buying a new pair of headphones: 1) are the ear cushions replaceable and 2) does the manufacturer sell them as a separate part?
For most of the earphones that are better than no name crap the answer is usually yes and yes. Bose has been particularly good to me with this. Last year they sent me a free set for 8+ year old headphones when I called them to inquire how to buy them. I have to add though, that I won't be buying Bose going forward for other reasons however.

Yes, not sure why I left that hanging. I have two separate friends who purchased the current top end Bose noise cancelling headphones (model 700) when they came out about 2 years ago. Somehow, these units failed the same way for both people, few months after the 1 year warranty passed. The failure is in the "computer" part of the headphones (after all, modern wireless headphones are essentially computers with speakers and microphones attached to them). They no longer "boot up" and throw an error code (expressed as a blinking pattern of the LED). There is a lot of reports about this on forums/reddit but I don't know how prevalent this issue actually is. It might be a freak accident that the two people that I know both experienced the same. In both cases, Bose said that there is nothing they can do and offered a 47% discount on a new pair. This is not a bad discount, if you've gotten several years out of your pair, but in this scenario it means shelling out $240/year. Long story short, when I buy a pair of earphones I expect them to last 5+ years and this is probably not something one can reasonably expect from modern ear computers because of all the added complexity and built in batteries. The above has left me hesitant to buy another Bose product. I have to add here, that I've had 3 pairs of Bose earphones (more primitive models than the modern ones) over the last 15 years that have served me reasonably well.
On Jan 14, 2022, at 11:56, David Mason <dmason@ryerson.ca> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2022, 11:25 AM -0500, GTALUG Talk <talk@gtalug.org>, wrote: I have to add though, that I won't be buying Bose going forward for other reasons however. Of course, when you say that everyone (or at least me) wonders what those reasons might be. :-)
../Dave

Hi Erica, The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005. However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them. The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy. I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear pads remain flawless. That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles. best, Kare On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple models for comparison across features: https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones
FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so far.
Erica
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi there,
You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back
actually means.
to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is my
preference. are closed back those behind your head then?
I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even with
no amp involved.
Kare
Karen,
Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of the
ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You
don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with
closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage is
one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually breathe.
Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms if
your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem for
IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones
actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory.
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi there,
Fine and interesting list.
To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no,
not just because of the sense of position, but because I have
something
talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone
ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the
background.
As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many
years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking
personally.
I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put
pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes
with the machine.
The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones
though is
A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver
units...oh and input power.
a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me
dizzy..literary.
And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my
reading
edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or
whatever.
It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair.
Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set
once
I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well.
Goodness but I miss radio shack.
Kare
Greetings Karen,
I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense
are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was
stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else.
The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way
to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to
standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players
from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(.
Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all
have something good in that price point to my knowledge.
As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people.
And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an
actual amp.
Take care,
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org
> | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x. > > Thanks. > > From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like > > mine. > > But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might > > find them > > useful.
>> Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically >> >> interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means >> >> that > there >> >> are a lot to choose from.
> There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be > > honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a > > reader > > (as I understand it).
> I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very > > individual > > thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs!
> Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: > > - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment) > - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly] > - 5.57 ounces > - button controls (what do they control?) > - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be > > very short]
> Do you use the buttons? What for? > > I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to > > clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find > > over-ear > > very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a > > minority.
> Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room > > ("closed")? > > I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful.
> Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are > > circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the > > room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads > > (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that > > even these get uncomfortable after a while. > > My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of > > soft > > tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from > > China. > > I have, for example: > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html > > Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. > > There are many other brands that are likely fine. > > There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi".
> TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient > > if you > have > > Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert > > analog > > to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them.
>
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list >
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Karen, What do you mean by dizzy actually? Normally that or fatigue is a comfort or sound sensitivity issue. For example, these days I've very sensitive to frequencies in the mid range and mid treble. That's about 400hz - 1khz and 6khz-10khz. You may want to figure out if your sensitive to sound issues in certain parts of the spectrum. Or perhaps you mean something else. This is just my experience with various people. Good luck with your search through, Nick On 1/14/22 15:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi Erica, The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005. However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them. The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy. I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear pads remain flawless. That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles. best, Kare
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple models for comparison across features: https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones
FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so far.
Erica
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi there,
You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back
actually means.
to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is my
preference. are closed back those behind your head then?
I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even with
no amp involved.
Kare
Karen,
Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of the
ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You
don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with
closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage is
one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually breathe.
Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms if
your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem for
IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones
actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory.
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
Hi there,
Fine and interesting list.
To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no,
not just because of the sense of position, but because I have
something
talking in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone
ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the
background.
As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many
years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking
personally.
I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put
pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes
with the machine.
The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones
though is
A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver
units...oh and input power.
a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me
dizzy..literary.
And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my
reading
edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or
whatever.
It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair.
Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set
once
I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well.
Goodness but I miss radio shack.
Kare
Greetings Karen,
I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense
are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was
stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else.
The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way
to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to
standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players
from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(.
Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all
have something good in that price point to my knowledge.
As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people.
And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an
actual amp.
Take care,
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
> | From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org > >> | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc ha-s44x. >> >> Thanks. >> >> From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't like >> >> mine. >> >> But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you might >> >> find them >> >> useful. > >>> Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically >>> >>> interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also means >>> >>> that > there >>> >>> are a lot to choose from. > >> There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but to be >> >> honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough for a >> >> reader >> >> (as I understand it). > >> I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very >> >> individual >> >> thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! > >> Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: >> >> - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your environment) >> - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly quickly] >> - 5.57 ounces >> - button controls (what do they control?) >> - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft would be >> >> very short] > >> Do you use the buttons? What for? >> >> I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as opposed to >> >> clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find >> >> over-ear >> >> very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a >> >> minority. > >> Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room >> >> ("closed")? >> >> I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. > >> Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They are >> >> circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in the >> >> room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and ear pads >> >> (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find that >> >> even these get uncomfortable after a while. >> >> My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection of >> >> soft >> >> tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones from >> >> China. >> >> I have, for example: >> >> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html >> >> Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. >> >> There are many other brands that are likely fine. >> >> There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". > >> TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly convenient >> >> if you > have >> >> Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to convert >> >> analog >> >> to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. > >> > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Hi nick, I still owe you a response to your note about cellphones, audiophiles, and in the ear monitors...imagine a scrunched face here. Speaking personally, one does not enjoy quality music on a cellphone smiles. This audiophile uses a real stereo with real speakers with her real vinyl collection. To answer your question, I was given too much anesthetic during an eye surgery resulting in a vascular accident to a very tiny part of my brain. In the area that processes speech. There are solutions, perhaps consult the book "the brain's way of healing." or even the CBC special. Anyway, one result is issues with some frequencies. Aside from headphones, rather a few cell phones, even cordless phones create the same impact, I can get dizzy, with some far far worse factors if exposure continues for a long time. My cell for example is a lg flip phone, not a smartphone. It seems? that the closer to analog, the happier my brain happens to be. Because I am a singer, some of the doctors discussed in the above referenced book began healing this part of my brain, neural plasticity is a magical thing. Could not finish due to expense at the time however. Intend returning, with everything crossed staff with the Listening centre here in Toronto remain well. Long answer to a short question, but long before I had a solution, I was choosing my audio gear very carefully, and my needs differ depending on the device in question. One set of headphone needs for my talking computer, another for my stereo, a third for my portable Walkman etc. Does this make sense? Kare On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Karen, What do you mean by dizzy actually? Normally that or fatigue is a comfort or sound sensitivity issue. For example, these days I've very sensitive to frequencies in the mid range and mid treble. That's about 400hz - 1khz and 6khz-10khz. You may want to figure out if your sensitive to sound issues in certain parts of the spectrum. Or perhaps you mean something else. This is just my experience with various people.
Good luck with your search through, Nick
On 1/14/22 15:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi Erica, The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005. However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them. The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy. I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear pads remain flawless. That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles. best, Kare
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple models for comparison across features: https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones
FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so far.
Erica
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi there,
You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back
actually means.
to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is my
preference. are closed back those behind your head then?
I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even with
no amp involved.
Kare
Karen,
Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of the
ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You
don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with
closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage is
one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually breathe.
Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms if
your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem for
IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones
actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory.
Nick
On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
> Hi there, > > Fine and interesting list. > > To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's > is a no, > > not just because of the sense of position, but because I have > > something > > talking in my ears when I use them in this particular > setting..no phone > > ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the > > background. > > As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for > many many > > years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, > speaking > > personally. > > I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to > put > > pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic > interferes > > with the machine. > > The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones > > though is > > A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and > driver > > units...oh and input power. > > a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will > make me > > dizzy..literary. > > And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my > > reading > > edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, > or > > whatever. > > It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. > > Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a > set > > once > > I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as > well. > > Goodness but I miss radio shack. > > Kare
Greetings Karen,
I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two sense
are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of headphones was
stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else.
The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the only way
to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to
standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good players
from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so sorry :(.
Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all
have something good in that price point to my knowledge.
As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most people.
And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using an
actual amp.
Take care,
Nick
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: > > > | From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org > > > > > | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc > > > | ha-s44x. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't > > > like > > > > > > mine. > > > > > > But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you > > > might > > > > > > find them > > > > > > useful. > > > > > > Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically > > > > > > > > interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also > > > > means > > > > > > > > that > there > > > > > > > > are a lot to choose from. > > > > > There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but > > > to be > > > > > > honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough > > > for a > > > > > > reader > > > > > > (as I understand it). > > > > > I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very > > > > > > individual > > > > > > thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! > > > > > Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: > > > > > > - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your > > > environment) > > > - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly > > > quickly] > > > - 5.57 ounces > > > - button controls (what do they control?) > > > - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft > > > would be > > > > > > very short] > > > > > Do you use the buttons? What for? > > > > > > I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as > > > opposed to > > > > > > clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find > > > > > > over-ear > > > > > > very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a > > > > > > minority. > > > > > Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room > > > > > > ("closed")? > > > > > > I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. > > > > > Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They > > > are > > > > > > circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in > > > the > > > > > > room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and > > > ear pads > > > > > > (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find > > > that > > > > > > even these get uncomfortable after a while. > > > > > > My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection > > > of > > > > > > soft > > > > > > tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones > > > from > > > > > > China. > > > > > > I have, for example: > > > > > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html > > > > > > Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. > > > > > > There are many other brands that are likely fine. > > > > > > There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". > > > > > TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly > > > convenient > > > > > > if you > have > > > > > > Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to > > > convert > > > > > > analog > > > > > > to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

On 1/14/22 15:52, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi nick, I still owe you a response to your note about cellphones, audiophiles, and in the ear monitors...imagine a scrunched face here. Speaking personally, one does not enjoy quality music on a cellphone smiles. This audiophile uses a real stereo with real speakers with her real vinyl collection. To answer your question, I was given too much anesthetic during an eye surgery resulting in a vascular accident to a very tiny part of my brain. In the area that processes speech. There are solutions, perhaps consult the book "the brain's way of healing." or even the CBC special. Anyway, one result is issues with some frequencies. Aside from headphones, rather a few cell phones, even cordless phones create the same impact, I can get dizzy, with some far far worse factors if exposure continues for a long time. My cell for example is a lg flip phone, not a smartphone. It seems? that the closer to analog, the happier my brain happens to be. Because I am a singer, some of the doctors discussed in the above referenced book began healing this part of my brain, neural plasticity is a magical thing. Could not finish due to expense at the time however. Intend returning, with everything crossed staff with the Listening centre here in Toronto remain well. Long answer to a short question, but long before I had a solution, I was choosing my audio gear very carefully, and my needs differ depending on the device in question. One set of headphone needs for my talking computer, another for my stereo, a third for my portable Walkman etc. Does this make sense? Kare
That helps now. So your talking about wave form issues with digital conversion. Most high end DACs get rid of this. As for headphones, that would be some part of the frequency not sure what. Most really high end headphones don't have this issue. I'm not a expert but that's probably in the mid high to high frequencies if your talking core less. It seems that's my best guess. You probably want PCM 96khz or above at least to get as close to analog as possible if that's your comment. As you mentioned unless you have a actual good DAC, it's not going to matter here. As for IEMs, the market is much better now. Sure it's not as good as true open backed or really, really high end loudspeakers i.e. Class A. I look at them more as it's not terrible from my very picky perspective for portable use. I'm very picky even more than most of the audiophiles I know. I was in the middle of researching my own vinyl setup actually that meets my standards. So far I'm figured out that moving coil is the only way to go. Not sure when it will happen through. Nick
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Karen, What do you mean by dizzy actually? Normally that or fatigue is a comfort or sound sensitivity issue. For example, these days I've very sensitive to frequencies in the mid range and mid treble. That's about 400hz - 1khz and 6khz-10khz. You may want to figure out if your sensitive to sound issues in certain parts of the spectrum. Or perhaps you mean something else. This is just my experience with various people.
Good luck with your search through, Nick
On 1/14/22 15:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi Erica, The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005. However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them. The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy. I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear pads remain flawless. That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles. best, Kare
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the > manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple > models for comparison across features: > https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones
FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not > based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in > recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. > I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable > doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, > and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I > just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are > made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so > far. Erica ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk > <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote: > > Hi there, > > > You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back > > > actually means. > > > to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is > > > my > > > preference. are closed back those behind your head then? > > > I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even > > > with > > > no amp involved. > > > Kare > Karen, > Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of > > the > ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You > don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with > closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage > > is > one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually > > breathe. > Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms > > if > your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem > > for > IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones > actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory. > Nick > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote: > > > > On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote: > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > Fine and interesting list. > > > > > > > To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's > > > > > is a no, > > > > > > > not just because of the sense of position, but because I have > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > talking in my ears when I use them in this particular > > > > > setting..no phone > > > > > > > ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the > > > > > > > background. > > > > > > > As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for > > > > > many many > > > > > > > years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, > > > > > speaking > > > > > > > personally. > > > > > > > I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to > > > > > put > > > > > > > pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic > > > > > interferes > > > > > > > with the machine. > > > > > > > The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones > > > > > > > though is > > > > > > > A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and > > > > > driver > > > > > > > units...oh and input power. > > > > > > > a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will > > > > > make me > > > > > > > dizzy..literary. > > > > > > > And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my > > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, > > > > > or > > > > > > > whatever. > > > > > > > It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. > > > > > > > Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a > > > > > set > > > > > > > once > > > > > > > I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > Goodness but I miss radio shack. > > > > > > > Kare > > > > > Greetings Karen, > > > > > I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two > > > > sense > > > > > are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of > > > > headphones was > > > > > stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else. > > > > > The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the > > > > only way > > > > > to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to > > > > > standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good > > > > players > > > > > from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so > > > > sorry :(. > > > > > Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all > > > > > have something good in that price point to my knowledge. > > > > > As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most > > > > people. > > > > > And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using > > > > an > > > > > actual amp. > > > > > Take care, > > > > > Nick > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > | From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc > > > > > > > | ha-s44x. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > mine. > > > > > > > > > > > But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > find them > > > > > > > > > > > useful. > > > > > > > > > > > Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically > > > > > > > > > > > > > interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also > > > > > > > > means > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > are a lot to choose from. > > > > > > > > > > There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but > > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > reader > > > > > > > > > > > (as I understand it). > > > > > > > > > > I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very > > > > > > > > > > > individual > > > > > > > > > > > thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! > > > > > > > > > > Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: > > > > > > > > > > > - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your > > > > > > > environment) > > > > - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly > > > > > > > quickly] > > > > - 5.57 ounces > > > > - button controls (what do they control?) > > > > - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > very short] > > > > > > > > > > Do you use the buttons? What for? > > > > > > > > > > > I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as > > > > > > > opposed to > > > > > > > > > > > clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find > > > > > > > > > > > over-ear > > > > > > > > > > > very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a > > > > > > > > > > > minority. > > > > > > > > > > Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room > > > > > > > > > > > ("closed")? > > > > > > > > > > > I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. > > > > > > > > > > Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and > > > > > > > ear pads > > > > > > > > > > > (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > even these get uncomfortable after a while. > > > > > > > > > > > My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > soft > > > > > > > > > > > tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > China. > > > > > > > > > > > I have, for example: > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html > > > > > > > > > > > Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. > > > > > > > > > > > There are many other brands that are likely fine. > > > > > > > > > > > There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". > > > > > > > > > > TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly > > > > > > > convenient > > > > > > > > > > > if you > have > > > > > > > > > > > Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to > > > > > > > convert > > > > > > > > > > > analog > > > > > > > > > > > to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Karen, if this is for a reader (not music), maybe you could visit (or email) Radioworld and talk with them about their headphones and headsets? Unfortunately there don't seem to be good product filtering options on the website, but I would think they would be knowledgeable about the specific parameters you care about. Cheers, Erica ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 4:53 PM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/14/22 15:52, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi nick,
I still owe you a response to your note about cellphones, audiophiles, and
in the ear monitors...imagine a scrunched face here.
Speaking personally, one does not enjoy quality music on a cellphone smiles.
This audiophile uses a real stereo with real speakers with her real vinyl collection.
To answer your question, I was given too much anesthetic during an eye surgery resulting in a vascular accident to a very tiny part of my brain. In the area that processes speech.
There are solutions, perhaps consult the book "the brain's way of healing." or even the CBC special.
Anyway, one result is issues with some frequencies. Aside from headphones, rather a few cell phones, even cordless phones create the same impact, I can get dizzy, with some far far worse factors if exposure continues for a long time.
My cell for example is a lg flip phone, not a smartphone.
It seems? that the closer to analog, the happier my brain happens to be.
Because I am a singer, some of the doctors discussed in the above referenced book began healing this part of my brain, neural plasticity is a magical thing.
Could not finish due to expense at the time however.
Intend returning, with everything crossed staff with the Listening centre here in Toronto remain well.
Long answer to a short question, but long before I had a solution, I was choosing my audio gear very carefully, and my needs differ depending on the device in question.
One set of headphone needs for my talking computer, another for my stereo, a third for my portable Walkman etc.
Does this make sense?
Kare
That helps now. So your talking about wave form issues with digital conversion. Most high
end DACs get rid of this. As for headphones, that would be some part of the frequency not
sure what. Most really high end headphones don't have this issue. I'm not a expert but
that's probably in the mid high to high frequencies if your talking core less. It
seems that's my best guess. You probably want PCM 96khz or above at least to get as close
to analog as possible if that's your comment. As you mentioned unless you have a actual
good DAC, it's not going to matter here.
As for IEMs, the market is much better now. Sure it's not as good as true open backed or
really, really high end loudspeakers i.e. Class A. I look at them more as it's not terrible
from my very picky perspective for portable use. I'm very picky even more than most of the
audiophiles I know. I was in the middle of researching my own vinyl setup actually that
meets my standards. So far I'm figured out that moving coil is the only way to go. Not sure
when it will happen through.
Nick
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Karen,
What do you mean by dizzy actually? Normally that or fatigue is a comfort or sound sensitivity issue.
For example, these days I've very sensitive to frequencies in the mid range and mid treble. That's
about 400hz - 1khz and 6khz-10khz. You may want to figure out if your sensitive to sound issues in
certain parts of the spectrum. Or perhaps you mean something else. This is just my experience with
various people.
Good luck with your search through,
Nick
On 1/14/22 15:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi Erica,
The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for
honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005.
However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them.
The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy.
I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear
pads remain flawless.
That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail
exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles.
best,
Kare
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the > manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple > models for comparison across features: > https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones
FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not > based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in > recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. > I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable > doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, > and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I > just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are > made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so > far.
Erica
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk > talk@gtalug.org wrote:
> On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back > > > > > > > > actually means. > > > > > > > > to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is > > > my > > > > > > > > preference. are closed back those behind your head then? > > > > > > > > I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even > > > with > > > > > > > > no amp involved. > > > > > > > > Kare > > > > > > > > Karen, > > > > > > > > Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of > > the > > > > > > > > ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You > > > > > > > > don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with > > > > > > > > closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage > > is > > > > > > > > one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually > > breathe. > > > > > > > > Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms > > if > > > > > > > > your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem > > for > > > > > > > > IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones > > > > > > > > actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory. > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fine and interesting list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's > > > > > is a no, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not just because of the sense of position, but because I have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talking in my ears when I use them in this particular > > > > > setting..no phone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > background. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for > > > > > many many > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, > > > > > speaking > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > personally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to > > > > > put > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic > > > > > interferes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the machine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and > > > > > driver > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > units...oh and input power. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will > > > > > make me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dizzy..literary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whatever. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a > > > > > set > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > once > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Goodness but I miss radio shack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings Karen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two > > > > sense > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of > > > > headphones was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the > > > > only way > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good > > > > players > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so > > > > sorry :(. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have something good in that price point to my knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most > > > > people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actual amp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take care, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > | From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc > > > > > > > | ha-s44x. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find them > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also > > > > > > > > means > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are a lot to choose from. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but > > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reader > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (as I understand it). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > individual > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your > > > > > > > environment) > > > > > > > > > > - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly > > > > > > > quickly] > > > > > - 5.57 ounces > > > > > - button controls (what do they control?) > > > > > - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very short] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you use the buttons? What for? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as > > > > > > > opposed to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > over-ear > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minority. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ("closed")? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and > > > > > > > ear pads > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > even these get uncomfortable after a while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > soft > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > China. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have, for example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are many other brands that are likely fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly > > > > > > > convenient > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to > > > > > > > convert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > analog > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 4:34 PM Erica Peterson via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
Karen, if this is for a reader (not music), maybe you could visit (or email) Radioworld and talk with them about their headphones and headsets? Unfortunately there don't seem to be good product filtering options on the website, but I would think they would be knowledgeable about the specific parameters you care about.
If particular frequencies are the issue then dropping an equalizer into the system and dropping those specific frequencies on something like a short tight (like 18dB roll off) cutoff could help. If its sound wave attenuation - - - that's going to be very tricky trying to 'fix' it. Find it interesting - - - the talk has come around to audiophile. Bought my stereo some 30 odd years ago. In the process found speakers that I really liked - - - that time the Infinity Quantum Reference II s. They were very very nice. I was auditioning using a recording of the Montreal Symphony doing Stravinski's Rite of Spring (Dances Sacre et Profane is a serious test). The 12' bass drum and the serious amount of cymbals and triangle are tough on systems. Then there was a recording of Bach's organ music (some of it) with the Toccata and Fugue in d using a 32' stop. Found out what that sounded felt like in a cathedral in Europe where the organist played the pedals using 'only' the 32' stop. That organ had some 70 hp on the blower and I was about 125' from the pipes - - - could feel a lot of energy through my feet that time! (that's also 16 Hz!) Then I was also using a recording of music feature Placido Domingo - - - the male voice is tough on speakers because the frequencies are moving from the mid/upper bass into the mid-range areas. Wished I could have bought those speakers (company now called Genesis) but they cost almost as much as I spent on the system that time. Brings back a few memories - - - - Regards

May I ask for the full company name? Radioworld is a new one for me. I do agree, they sound like a fine resource! Cheers, Karen On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
Karen, if this is for a reader (not music), maybe you could visit (or email) Radioworld and talk with them about their headphones and headsets? Unfortunately there don't seem to be good product filtering options on the website, but I would think they would be knowledgeable about the specific parameters you care about.
Cheers, Erica
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 4:53 PM, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/14/22 15:52, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi nick,
I still owe you a response to your note about cellphones, audiophiles, and
in the ear monitors...imagine a scrunched face here.
Speaking personally, one does not enjoy quality music on a cellphone smiles.
This audiophile uses a real stereo with real speakers with her real vinyl collection.
To answer your question, I was given too much anesthetic during an eye surgery resulting in a vascular accident to a very tiny part of my brain. In the area that processes speech.
There are solutions, perhaps consult the book "the brain's way of healing." or even the CBC special.
Anyway, one result is issues with some frequencies. Aside from headphones, rather a few cell phones, even cordless phones create the same impact, I can get dizzy, with some far far worse factors if exposure continues for a long time.
My cell for example is a lg flip phone, not a smartphone.
It seems? that the closer to analog, the happier my brain happens to be.
Because I am a singer, some of the doctors discussed in the above referenced book began healing this part of my brain, neural plasticity is a magical thing.
Could not finish due to expense at the time however.
Intend returning, with everything crossed staff with the Listening centre here in Toronto remain well.
Long answer to a short question, but long before I had a solution, I was choosing my audio gear very carefully, and my needs differ depending on the device in question.
One set of headphone needs for my talking computer, another for my stereo, a third for my portable Walkman etc.
Does this make sense?
Kare
That helps now. So your talking about wave form issues with digital conversion. Most high
end DACs get rid of this. As for headphones, that would be some part of the frequency not
sure what. Most really high end headphones don't have this issue. I'm not a expert but
that's probably in the mid high to high frequencies if your talking core less. It
seems that's my best guess. You probably want PCM 96khz or above at least to get as close
to analog as possible if that's your comment. As you mentioned unless you have a actual
good DAC, it's not going to matter here.
As for IEMs, the market is much better now. Sure it's not as good as true open backed or
really, really high end loudspeakers i.e. Class A. I look at them more as it's not terrible
from my very picky perspective for portable use. I'm very picky even more than most of the
audiophiles I know. I was in the middle of researching my own vinyl setup actually that
meets my standards. So far I'm figured out that moving coil is the only way to go. Not sure
when it will happen through.
Nick
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Karen,
What do you mean by dizzy actually? Normally that or fatigue is a comfort or sound sensitivity issue.
For example, these days I've very sensitive to frequencies in the mid range and mid treble. That's
about 400hz - 1khz and 6khz-10khz. You may want to figure out if your sensitive to sound issues in
certain parts of the spectrum. Or perhaps you mean something else. This is just my experience with
various people.
Good luck with your search through,
Nick
On 1/14/22 15:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi Erica,
The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for
honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005.
However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them.
The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy.
I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear
pads remain flawless.
That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail
exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles.
best,
Kare
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the > manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple > models for comparison across features: > https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones
> FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not > based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in > recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. > I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable > doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, > and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I > just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are > made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so > far. > > Erica > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk > talk@gtalug.org wrote: > >> On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote: >> >>>> Hi there, >>>> >>>>> You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back >>>>> >>>>> actually means. >>>>> >>>>> to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is > > > my >>>>> >>>>> preference. are closed back those behind your head then? >>>>> >>>>> I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even > > > with >>>>> >>>>> no amp involved. >>>>> >>>>> Kare >>>>> >>>>> Karen, >>>>> >>>>> Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of > > the >>>>> >>>>> ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You >>>>> >>>>> don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with >>>>> >>>>> closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage > > is >>>>> >>>>> one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually > > breathe. >>>>> >>>>> Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms > > if >>>>> >>>>> your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem > > for >>>>> >>>>> IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones >>>>> >>>>> actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory. >>>>> >>>>> Nick >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote: >>>> >>>>>> On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi there, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fine and interesting list. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's > > > > > is a no, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> not just because of the sense of position, but because I have >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> talking in my ears when I use them in this particular > > > > > setting..no phone >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> background. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for > > > > > many many >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, > > > > > speaking >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> personally. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to > > > > > put >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic > > > > > interferes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> with the machine. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> though is >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and > > > > > driver >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> units...oh and input power. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will > > > > > make me >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> dizzy..literary. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, > > > > > or >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> whatever. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a > > > > > set >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as > > > > > well. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Goodness but I miss radio shack. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kare >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Greetings Karen, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two > > > > sense >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of > > > > headphones was >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the > > > > only way >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good > > > > players >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so > > > > sorry :(. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> have something good in that price point to my knowledge. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most > > > > people. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using > > > > an >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> actual amp. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Take care, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nick >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> | From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc > > > > > > > | ha-s44x. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't > > > > > > > like >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you > > > > > > > might >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> find them >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> useful. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also > > > > > > > > means >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are a lot to choose from. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but > > > > > > > to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough > > > > > > > for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (as I understand it). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your > > > > > > > environment) >>>>>> >>>>>> - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly > > > > > > > quickly] >>>>>> - 5.57 ounces >>>>>> - button controls (what do they control?) >>>>>> - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft > > > > > > > would be >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> very short] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you use the buttons? What for? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as > > > > > > > opposed to >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> over-ear >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> minority. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ("closed")? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They > > > > > > > are >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in > > > > > > > the >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and > > > > > > > ear pads >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find > > > > > > > that >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> even these get uncomfortable after a while. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection > > > > > > > of >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> soft >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones > > > > > > > from >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> China. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have, for example: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There are many other brands that are likely fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly > > > > > > > convenient >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if you > have >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to > > > > > > > convert >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> analog >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe from this mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe from this mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

The full name is Radioworld. Their website is https://www.radioworld.ca/ and they have a physical store on Steeles in North York, with somewhat limited hours. They sell gear for amateur radio, marine/aviation, GPS, including a variety of headphones and headsets. Cheers, Erica ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 6:03 PM, Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> wrote:
May I ask for the full company name?
Radioworld is a new one for me.
I do agree, they sound like a fine resource!
Cheers,
Karen
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
Karen, if this is for a reader (not music), maybe you could visit (or email) Radioworld and talk with them about their headphones and headsets? Unfortunately there don't seem to be good product filtering options on the website, but I would think they would be knowledgeable about the specific parameters you care about.
Cheers,
Erica
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 4:53 PM, Nicholas Krause xerofoify@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/14/22 15:52, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi nick,
I still owe you a response to your note about cellphones, audiophiles, and
in the ear monitors...imagine a scrunched face here.
Speaking personally, one does not enjoy quality music on a cellphone smiles.
This audiophile uses a real stereo with real speakers with her real vinyl collection.
To answer your question, I was given too much anesthetic during an eye surgery resulting in a vascular accident to a very tiny part of my brain. In the area that processes speech.
There are solutions, perhaps consult the book "the brain's way of healing." or even the CBC special.
Anyway, one result is issues with some frequencies. Aside from headphones, rather a few cell phones, even cordless phones create the same impact, I can get dizzy, with some far far worse factors if exposure continues for a long time.
My cell for example is a lg flip phone, not a smartphone.
It seems? that the closer to analog, the happier my brain happens to be.
Because I am a singer, some of the doctors discussed in the above referenced book began healing this part of my brain, neural plasticity is a magical thing.
Could not finish due to expense at the time however.
Intend returning, with everything crossed staff with the Listening centre here in Toronto remain well.
Long answer to a short question, but long before I had a solution, I was choosing my audio gear very carefully, and my needs differ depending on the device in question.
One set of headphone needs for my talking computer, another for my stereo, a third for my portable Walkman etc.
Does this make sense?
Kare
That helps now. So your talking about wave form issues with digital conversion. Most high
end DACs get rid of this. As for headphones, that would be some part of the frequency not
sure what. Most really high end headphones don't have this issue. I'm not a expert but
that's probably in the mid high to high frequencies if your talking core less. It
seems that's my best guess. You probably want PCM 96khz or above at least to get as close
to analog as possible if that's your comment. As you mentioned unless you have a actual
good DAC, it's not going to matter here.
As for IEMs, the market is much better now. Sure it's not as good as true open backed or
really, really high end loudspeakers i.e. Class A. I look at them more as it's not terrible
from my very picky perspective for portable use. I'm very picky even more than most of the
audiophiles I know. I was in the middle of researching my own vinyl setup actually that
meets my standards. So far I'm figured out that moving coil is the only way to go. Not sure
when it will happen through.
Nick
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Karen,
What do you mean by dizzy actually? Normally that or fatigue is a comfort or sound sensitivity issue.
For example, these days I've very sensitive to frequencies in the mid range and mid treble. That's
about 400hz - 1khz and 6khz-10khz. You may want to figure out if your sensitive to sound issues in
certain parts of the spectrum. Or perhaps you mean something else. This is just my experience with
various people.
Good luck with your search through,
Nick
On 1/14/22 15:10, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Hi Erica,
The Sony Mdr-7506 headphones have been a staple of audio production for
honestly decades. I got my pair in hmmm2004 or 2005.
However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them.
The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy.
I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear
pads remain flawless.
That being said, I may be reaching out to Sony directly, as my e-mail
exchange with JVC is becoming rather frustrating smiles.
best,
Kare
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Erica Peterson wrote:
> You may have better luck picking a few common brands and going to the > manufacturer websites. Sony, for example, will let you select multiple > models for comparison across features: > https://www.sony.ca/en/electronics/headphones/t/headband-headphones > > > FWIW, about 5 years ago I got a Sony MDR-7506 headset -- admittedly, not > based on any sort of audiophile specs, but because I'd seen them used in > recording studios and figured that was a strong point in their favor. > I'm still very happy with it but with two small quibbles: (1) the cable > doesn't detach, so it would be a pain to replace if I were to damage it, > and (2) the material covering the pads degrades after a few years. I > just replaced the pads with "Wicked Cushions" from Amazon, which are > made to fit popular headset models. The Wicked Cushions are great so > far. > > > > Erica > > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > > On Friday, January 14th, 2022 at 1:02 AM, Nicholas Krause via talk > talk@gtalug.org wrote: > > > > > On 2022-01-14 12:50 a.m., Karen Lewellen wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > > > > You know something I have a hard time picturing what closed back > > > > > > > > > > > > actually means. > > > > > > > > > > > > to my imagination open back means nothing behind my head, which is > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > preference. are closed back those behind your head then? > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree on 32 for impedance..but sometimes they are higher. even > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > > no amp involved. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kare > > > > > > > > > > > > Karen, > > > > > > > > > > > > Open Backs have open grills or leak sound through the outer part of > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > ear cups. They don't isolated sound the way most headphones do. You > > > > > > > > > > > > don't see them outside of the audiophile market. The problem with > > > > > > > > > > > > closing or isolating sound is frequency issues basically. Sound stage > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > one big improvement on them as you can let the drivers actually > > breathe. > > > > > > > > > > > > Most consumer amps in cellphones or whatever can get about 60-90 ohms > > if > > > > > > > > > > > > your asking. So anything beyond that is not good. This is a problem > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > IEMS in the audiophile market as they have to gear them for cellphones > > > > > > > > > > > > actually so most are around 32-48 ohms from memory. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, Nicholas Krause wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-01-13 4:25 p.m., Karen Lewellen via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fine and interesting list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's > > > > > is a no, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not just because of the sense of position, but because I have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > talking in my ears when I use them in this particular > > > > > setting..no phone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ringing, door bells, or the all important music playing in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > background. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for > > > > > many many > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years, over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, > > > > > speaking > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > personally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to > > > > > put > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pressure on my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic > > > > > interferes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the machine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and > > > > > driver > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > units...oh and input power. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will > > > > > make me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dizzy..literary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > edge, differs for what I use for production, or music listening, > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whatever. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a > > > > > set > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > once > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I got from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Goodness but I miss radio shack. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings Karen, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would not find the model in the previous email. However, my two > > > > sense > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are over ear can mean different things. A current pair of > > > > headphones was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stated that but it's more what Hugh was calling something else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The other things were I normally prefer open backed as it's the > > > > only way > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to not screw around with frequency issues. I've my reasons. As to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > standard closed backs AKG, Sennheiser, Sony are the big good > > > > players > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from memory. I'm not sure of the site design for your needs so > > > > sorry :(. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your original pair was around 200 dollars from memory and they all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have something good in that price point to my knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As to weight normally anything under 400 grams is fine for most > > > > people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And for impendance it should be 32 ohms or less if your not using > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > actual amp. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take care, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > | From: Karen Lewellen via talk talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > | If you desire a visual idea then perhaps google jvc > > > > > > > | ha-s44x. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From past discussions, I know your shopping technique isn't > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I'll mention my considerations on the off chance you > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > find them > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most wired headphones are electrically / electronically > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > interchangeable. Of course that's a good thing. It also > > > > > > > > means > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are a lot to choose from. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are lots of issues of sound reproduction quality, but > > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > honest, all should have sound quality that is good enough > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reader > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (as I understand it). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would imagine that the main issues are comfort -- a very > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > individual > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing. Oh, and durability -- not something in the specs! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's what I glean from the specs of your old headphones: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - closed (i.e. they try to block sound from your > > > > > > > environment) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - over-ear [I find such headphones uncomfortable fairly > > > > > > > quickly] > > > > > > > - 5.57 ounces > > > > > > > - button controls (what do they control?) > > > > > > > - 1.2 m cable [the units are unspecified but 1.2 ft > > > > > > > would be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very short] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you use the buttons? What for? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think "over-ear" means that these clamp on your ear as > > > > > > > opposed to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clamping on your head around the ear ("circumaural"). I find > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > over-ear > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very uncomfortable after a few minutes but I seem to be in a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > minority. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you really want to have sound isolation from the room > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ("closed")? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I imagine "situational awareness" would be useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Out of habit, I use ancient Sennheiser HD430 phones. They > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > circumaural, light, open [i.e. I can hear things going on in > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > room], good enough sound. They have replaceable cables and > > > > > > > ear pads > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (but now hard to find). Out of production since 1986. I find > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > even these get uncomfortable after a while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My current favourite is ear-buds. The ones with a selection > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > soft > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tips, not the hard ones. You can get decent inexpensive ones > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > China. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have, for example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002184896879.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently C$16.84 without microphone. I paid less. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are many other brands that are likely fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is an enthusiastic following for "Chi-fi". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TWS (true wireless stereo) headphones are amazingly > > > > > > > convenient > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bluetooth. But you don't. There are a lot of adapters to > > > > > > > convert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > analog > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to Bluetooth but I don't have any experience with them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> | However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them. | The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy. | I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear pads | remain flawless. I don't see how impedance could have anything to do with making you dizzy. Could you explain? I'm not saying those headphones don't make you dizzy. But it would be very interesting to know the mechanism. If I had to guess at a factor that might cause dizziness, I'd pick problems with phase. That would imply serious filters, I'd think. Plain old passive headphones don't have fancy filters. Perhaps one driver wired backwards: that would make one signal 180 degrees out of phase. But that doesn't seem like an easy mistake to make. (It is easy on some home stereo's the swap the lines into a speaker.)

I actually hit upon impedance here because that is the one number generally that does not match the specifications I am using for this particular search. That being said, the surgery in question took place in 1992. It would be more than a decade before this incident could even be measured and diagnosed, and almost two or so before some of the science started to provide options, and that is still changing. Kare On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org>
| However, this is a fine example of my personal issue...I cannot use them. | The impedance on this model is 24, and they make me dizzy. | I do have production assistants use them, and in all these years the ear pads | remain flawless.
I don't see how impedance could have anything to do with making you dizzy. Could you explain?
I'm not saying those headphones don't make you dizzy. But it would be very interesting to know the mechanism.
If I had to guess at a factor that might cause dizziness, I'd pick problems with phase. That would imply serious filters, I'd think. Plain old passive headphones don't have fancy filters.
Perhaps one driver wired backwards: that would make one signal 180 degrees out of phase. But that doesn't seem like an easy mistake to make. (It is easy on some home stereo's the swap the lines into a speaker.) --- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

| From: Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> | To be sure, the idea of noise cancellation, or any variation's is a no, I never suggested noise cancellation. That's a whole other kettle of fish. I talked about "closed" vs "open". Your existing headphones are "closed", according to the specs I read. That means that they block sound travelling through the outside of the cup. They block sound two ways: leaking from the headphone to the room and from the room to the ear. I thought that if you are using your reader, you might still want to hear what's happening in the room, albeit in an attenuated way. For example, you might want to hear other people in the room. Or you might not. That's why I mentioned closed vs. open as a choice. Nicholas had other considerations for the open / closed choice. They were beyond my experience or knowledge. | not | just because of the sense of position, but because I have something talking | in my ears when I use them in this particular setting..no phone ringing, door | bells, or the all important music playing in the background. I don't quite understand. If you have someone talking in you ears, do you want to hear them or block them out? | As I have been a radio producer, and professional singer for many many years, | over the ear headphones are the most comfortable, speaking personally. | I truly dislike earbuds, they tend not to stay in my ears, to put pressure on | my ear canal etc...and the buttons are a no, mic interferes with the machine. The specs I saw said your existing headphones had buttons but did not say what the buttons did. <https://productz.com/en/jvc-ha-s44x/p/nQYn> | The most important thing, for this particular set of headphones though is | A combination of frequency range, sensitivity, impedance, and driver | units...oh and input power. I understood that these phones were for a reader. I cannot imagine that frequency range would be critical. I would not imagine that stereo mattered. | a few settings in the wrong direction, and the headphones will make me | dizzy..literary. Very important point! I imagine that's mostly about phase problems or artifacts of noise cancellation. If I understood correctly that this is for your Kurzweil reader, I suspect monophonic headphones would be fine. If you used the headphones monophonically, would that prevent dizziness? | And those numbers can be device specific, what I will use for my reading edge, | differs for what I use for production, or music listening, or whatever. | It is part of why once found I may buy more than one pair. | Cannot fault you for using the same ones since the 80's. Had a set once I got | from radio shack that I used for more than a decade as well. | Goodness but I miss radio shack. I just took a dead (but not leaky!) Radio Shack 9v battery out of nework tester that I hadn't used in some time. The Source still exists (unlike US Radio Shack). But it has devolved. They still have headphones. And their page has filters -- I'm not sure that they'd work for you. <https://www.thesource.ca/en-ca/audio-headphones/headphones/c/scc-6-1>

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 07:45:05PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Actually, if I can search by brand it would help. For example, there seems to be a JvC series that replaced the one I am using right now...for one working ear at least. I have a soft spot for Sony as well, with the spec details what I need most and am not finding. Site the obvious?
I just noticed staples.ca has quite decent filter options. Filters include bluetooh, microphone, in-ear, over-ear, and on-ear and some other stuff. They have these JVC wired headphones for example. https://www.staples.ca/products/2464727-en-jvc-ha-rx330-full-size-over-ear-h... -- Len Sorensen

well..those must be free as no details show in a low graphics browser grin. Seriously, that is one of the pair I intend asking JVC Canada about. The specifications I need do not quite match, but that pair is just one of a series that seem to increase in sound detail. In fact, locating that pair gives me hope I can stay with JVC for this particular usage. Thanks, Kare On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 07:45:05PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Actually, if I can search by brand it would help. For example, there seems to be a JvC series that replaced the one I am using right now...for one working ear at least. I have a soft spot for Sony as well, with the spec details what I need most and am not finding. Site the obvious?
I just noticed staples.ca has quite decent filter options. Filters include bluetooh, microphone, in-ear, over-ear, and on-ear and some other stuff.
They have these JVC wired headphones for example.
https://www.staples.ca/products/2464727-en-jvc-ha-rx330-full-size-over-ear-h...
-- Len Sorensen
participants (10)
-
Alex Kink
-
D. Hugh Redelmeier
-
David Mason
-
Don Tai
-
Erica Peterson
-
Gron Arthur
-
Karen Lewellen
-
Lennart Sorensen
-
Nicholas Krause
-
o1bigtenor