
It works for me. Few tasks seem awkward or difficult. The learning curve wasn't bad (unless, perhaps, you are grumpy and resentful). I admit: 1. I like simplicity. Some enjoy the power of a complex interface. 2. the changes have mostly been gradual (cue lobster boiling story) 3. I don't use other desktops often (so I don't know what I'm missing) It is visually simple. Of course that seems to be a common complaint: "GNOME has simplified away my favourite things". It can feel a bit like the novel "The Memory Police". I don't remember a painful learning experience I don't understand how everything is plumbed together (iBus?). That doesn't seem to matter but it makes me nervous. I don't have to use my mouse too often. But that means learning replacements that may not seem obvious or be easy to discover. One goal of the designers is to reduce options (to simplify things). I think they have gone too far in some cases so the first thing I do is install the GNOME Tweaks tool and adjust a few things. - switch to EMACS keystrokes - switch the touchpad to have reserved space for button emulation (although I'm now playing with using multi-finger gestures instead as a personal experiment) - put the day-of-the-week in the date at the top of the screen - display the battery charge as a percentage (that setting has migrated to the standard interface, albeit in a hard-to-find corner) - turn off the setting Windows: "Attach Modal Dialogs" - I don't, but you can add more buttons to window headers (eg. minimize) The key to using GNOME effectively is to know a few things that are not announced with visual affordances. The GNOME intro video presented when you first use GNOME may explain them, I don't know. Describing actions in a GUI, in words, is long and laborious. Sorry. The WINDOWS key is very powerful. - tapping it shows you all your running desktop programs in a matrix of screen images filling the whole screen. + you can choose one of them with the mouse or the arrow keys + you can start typing the name of a program (and some other things) and it will show you likely targets. You can: * hit ENTER to start or switch to that program * hit TAB to switch the selection to the next program in the array * keep typing to narrow the selection + you can switch workspaces (but only if there is a program running in it: you have to select a program running in it) - if you press and hold the WINDOWS key you can switch between running programs using the tab key and the arrow keys. Using arrow keys you can switch between windows of the same program. Sample easy tasks: - ping-pong between the two most recent running desktop programs: WINDOWS-TAB (use the WINDOW key as a modifier or shift for TAB) - switch between windows of a program: While holding down WINDOWS, tab to the correct program, down-arrow (showing each instance), use arrow keys to select the one you want, release WINDOWS. Alternatively, at the top second-from-left position is the name of the currently running program. If you click on it, you can select between instances. - power down the system. + Normal way: click on power symbol in top right corner. From the resulting, choose the second power symbol, choose "power off". Confirm that you really mean it. + mouseless: type WINDOWS, "pow", TAB (to highlight power off), RETURN to select it. Confirm that you really mean it (mouse click OR TAB ENTER) I don't tend to use the mouse to operate the desktop, except for infrequent tasks. Oh, and selecting a different window, if already visible and my hand is already on the mouse) What I'd welcome: some more automated way of configuring the layout of windows. But I don't know what I would actually like.

Thanks Hugh. I had just sent this response to Lennart, but maybe this thread is better. I was first alerted to the initiative when Marcel Gagne posted to say "this is cool" (he has since backtracked). A member of the documentation team posted here to say they were coming to town, and Hugh followed up with more specific location details. I went to Seneca@York and met volunteers from the States, BC, Germany, the UK, Chile, and a couple of locals including the maintainer of dbus. After being involved in the early 2000s downloading and testing GNOME for the Debian effort, I had turned into a passive user of GNOME 2. Getting involved with GNOME 3 turned me back into an enthusiastic user. I use assorted GNOME utilities but mainly Boxes and Firefox. Mike
participants (2)
-
D. Hugh Redelmeier
-
Michael Hill