LOL agreed. Having worked on both sides of 49th Parallel, I can think of a few former US colleagues who are as flamboyant, egotistical and hysterically comical as Joseph MacMillan, the prodigal son of an IBM executive. On Friday, January 5, 2018, Loui Chang via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:

On Fri 05 Jan 2018 20:16 -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:

...

I do like the Mike Judge show Silicon Valley. Probably because I give a comedy more license.

I think they intentionally misuse technical jargon for comedic effect, for those who can decipher what they are actually saying.

--- Talk Mailing List talk@gtalug.org https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

-- r360design.ca

| From: Ken Heard via talk <talk@gtalug.org> | On 2018-01-06 06:03, R360 Design INC via talk wrote: | | > Wanted to recommend the AMC Series "Halt and Catch Fire" on Netflix. | > For those who haven't heard of it, it is an American period drama that | > depicts a fictionalized insider's view of the personal computer | > revolution of the 1980s and later the growth of the World Wide Web in | > the early 1990s. It offered an insider's glimpse into the power | > struggles from Silicon Prairie of Dallas=E2=80=93Fort Worth to Silicon = | Valley. | | Has anybody written a factual history of said revolution? Millions of fawning accounts have been written about the successes and some about spectacular failures. The reality is that much unfolded because when it's time to railroad, everyone railroads. Books are almost always better than movies or TV series. Scholarly papers are even better. Interviews with participants are fascinating but need to be pieced together like jigsaw puzzles pieces that don't quite fit. For example, you only hear about the hacker communities at MIT and in the SF bay area (see Hackers by Stephen Levy). But there were probably hackers everywhere (I was part of a community of such in Toronto and in Waterloo). Note: I'm talking about the original meaning of Hacker. The bit of HCF that I saw was about inter-personal politics. The setting was a recreation, with accuracy of little importance (they did try for some verisimilitude but cool and sexy were higher priorities). A fundamental problem is that reality isn't a narrative and it must be shaped into one to make a satisfying drama. Here's how I see the forces at the time: - the IBM PC was not a great technical step forward BUT it set a template around which everyone could standardize. The network effect. - how much could you legally copy the PC? + Many many companies copied 99%, making better and cheaper machines, (Ottawa's Hyperion was a lovely example). But the market wanted 100% compatibility. + precise copying was a matter for the courts. It was not a technical problem. Cautious people assumed that it would violate IP laws. - how much uniformity was required? I always underestimated this. MS Flight Simulator had to run unchanged. - some little things are consequential and some big things are not. At the time, you cannot know. At the time, I was holding out for a computer that could run Unix. DOS wasn't interesting. I did buy a Kaypro II (Z80 CPU, CP/M OS) for office tasks (word processing, spreadsheets, remote access to a computer) a little after the IBM PC came out but before there were clones. It cost significantly less than half a PC and performed just as well. It just wasn't the future. I thought that the future would be the technically best machines possible. I was so wrong. The Xerox Alto and the Apple Lisa looked a lot more interesting and useful than the IBM PC. The story of Xerox PARC has been told, but not in film as far as I know.