
Ah, thanks for the explanation Evan. You may be correct, especially since Teksavy is still supporting analogue services in general. As for what bell is violating, because phone service falls under cRTC rules, its those rules they are violating. still, if I am forthright, I would rather a solid solution, not a long drawn out fight. I use the phone for work, with complaining not very financially rewarding smiles. Kare On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM Karen Lewellen via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:
Evan, I did not get your post, but will go back and hunt my inbox. Is your suggestion that techsavvy might have an emulator that might be more friendly to my equipment?
Not quite. I was saying that Teksavvy uses different in-home router equipment than Bell and it might be friendlier to your analog phone.
Having said that, I agree with Hugh that it should be Bell's problem and task to ensure that you're able to use your phone on their equipment. Rendering your existing phone non-functional on its new installation may be in violation of AODA.
- Evan