
Speaking personally that depends on how this is being done. If, as I asked, Firefox is apart of a nonprofit organization, then google should not be donating, then getting this money back in tax benefits. The requirement to pull back on their antitrust payments might expose this other illegal benefit for the company. That again assumes Mozilla is a 501,c,3, equal in the u. s. to a charity. Kare On Tue, 13 Aug 2024, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 12:17 PM Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> wrote:
The antitrust case is not about browsers.
I know that. I was responding to Hugh's comment that the court action on search might affect Firefox funding. Even if Google is forced to change its funding model from "pay to be the default search" to something else, it cannot be seen to remedy one monopoly situation by creating another,
- Evan