On 14 February 2018 at 14:32, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk <talk@gtalug.org> wrote:

| > Almost NO 32-bit x86 chips are in current production.  I think that
| > Intel has some goofy SoCs for IoT applications that are limited to
| > 32-bit but they really don't matter.
|
| No, they canned that line last year. They really were not very good.

This doesn't say that it is EoLed.  But I do think I heard that they
stopped work in this direction.

<https://ark.intel.com/products/91949>

The "segfault bug" (lock instruction (prefix?) bug) sounds bad:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quark#Segfault_bug>

That's an awesome solution they implemented there: "don't use LOCK."  Intel says "It's 2014, you don't need multi-threading!"

There's this assumption among many computer geeks (until today I was among them) that Intel is the chip "gold standard."  I _should_ have changed my mind on that after their spectacularly poor response to Spectre and Meltdown.  And then there's the security nightmare of the IME, a horribly insecure computer-within-your-computer.  But for some reason, I think this is the figurative straw that broke the camel's back: I'm going to be looking to other chip manufacturers after this.

All my vehemence and reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine shows that AMD has created their own IME-alike.  Security is a thing of the past ...

--