On 3/9/23 09:16, Lennart Sorensen via talk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 05:04:52PM -0500, William Park via talk wrote:
Mine is <https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=366a5b37-ac7f-4c79-a3e3-f2a60175e726> Well I get an F. I then followed their instructions to add sqm to my openwrt setup, which made it a D, but at a cost of 75% of the throughput (so 6Mbit instead of 25Mbit), so I turned that off again since that was too high a price for a slight latency improvement. Perhaps some tweaking could make it better.
Yes: the penalty for fq_codel or CAKE should be an indicated percent or so, and often is a benefit instead (:-)). Older software is often bad enough that it eats bandwidth. Look for a openwrt release that mentions one or the other of those keywords, preferably CAKE. There is more information about what code is best. --dave