-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stewart wrote:
The reason given by Yahoo is this:
That's got it completely backwards. For a mailing list the "Sender" is the list address, "From" is the person who actually wrote the message[1]. And if "Reply-to" munging must be done, then common (bad) practice is to set it to the list address. I wouldn't take any pains to accommodate such a badly broken mail provider, especially on a technical list like this where people understand the problem. I run a number of mailing lists, and on the non-technical lists I do mung "Reply-to" to the list address because the subscribers to those lists expect that behaviour. My preference is to mung "Reply-to" only when the message author has not explicitly set it, respecting the author's intent. As far as I know, only Listserv can do this. Sadly, neither Mailman nor Mercury Mail have that degree of finesse. I'm sure everyone has seen this and the posts leading up to it: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-still-harmful.html - --Bob. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2 - -- Bob Jonkman <bjonkman@sobac.com> Phone: +1-519-635-9413 SOBAC Microcomputer Services http://sobac.com/sobac/ Software --- Office & Business Automation --- Consulting GnuPG Fngrprnt:04F7 742B 8F54 C40A E115 26C2 B912 89B0 D2CC E5EA On 2016-06-11 11:19 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
If replies seem patchy, we've just had a bunch of people - mostly Yahoo and Rogers users - auto-kicked from the list due to DMARC. This is an ongoing pain for list admins. The reason given by Yahoo is this:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN7253.html
Yeah, they're advising Reply-To mungeing as an industry standard. Joy!
cheers, Stewart --- Talk Mailing List talk@gtalug.org https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Ensure confidentiality, authenticity, non-repudiability iEYEARECAAYFAldcTMYACgkQuRKJsNLM5eoWbwCg3cRsDNfJMAfWvC2chKUZgz1m 3zAAoMAzmEbUd2YxO4r9naAn4hodSLQZ =ng6P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----