On 1/16/21 10:41 PM, James Knott via talk wrote:
On 2021-01-16 10:33 p.m., D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
This is something I quite agree with. I gave up complaining about 20 years ago but would welcome a change:
As a computer tech, having worked with computers such as the VAX 11/780 and Data General Eclipse, before I ever touched a PC, I'd have to agree.
The other two that annoy me are trying to lock down the number of PCI-E lanes or amount of memory. At least AMD fixed that with Threadripper Pro. Intel really needs to stop letting their marketing team create artificial limits in the product stack. My predication is if ECC were more mainstream actually prices for it would probably stop being 2-3x or even more like they are currently. A lot of people I know if they can use ECC choose not to due to this issue and it being mainstream would help with this. Unfortunately, Intel isn't the only company that creates artificial limits in their hardware stack. It's a good example of why having your marketing team run the product stack is a bad idea, sign. Linus should be complaining about these limits and it's a wonder he hasn't been more vocal about it. At least AMD tries their best to not limit the stack if possible for example board compatibility is far better so long as you flash a new BIOs for the next generation chips and even listened when users wanted more support but they were going to stop first/second generation Ryzen if I recall correctly with new chips, Nick
--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk