(I gather that Docker tries hard at another take on "making it easier")We had a talk on Bosh recently, which represents a newer way of goingsetting a VM to install X"?boring in that it amounted to "so, how do we go through the mechanics ofWe had a series of talks over the years on virtualization which kind of gotOn 9 December 2014 at 14:37, Blaise Alleyne <email+libre@blaise.ca> wrote:That's certainly interesting.
>
> On 08/12/14 12:47 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> > - I'm interested in setting up my in-house services like a cloud.
> > Perhaps <http://owncloud.org/>. Motivation: I want to keep control
> > of my own data as much as possible. Can anyone speak to this?
> >
>
> I could happily speak to this in the future.
>
> I'm self-hosting a bunch of stuff at home, as part of my own degooglification
> process: ownCloud, SOGo, Snowy, Mediagoblin, Tiny Tiny RSS, Dokuwiki... in the
> past, MythTV (including Mythweb), Mediawiki, Ampache... and services I'm
> hosting, but not at home, include FreeSWITCH and ejabberd (and email...).
>
> I also gave a talk at FSOSS this year on software freedom in a networked work,
> which covered some of this as well, though not as a technical talk.
through those mechanics. Interesting in that it has gotten easier.The OTHER side of this is managing the infrastructure for a set of VMs.I'm not keen on something where that's a big job; it sure would be nice ifmost of the time spent managing a dozen services is spent on those
dozen services.I know VMWare sells a product, vSphere, targeted at this, and that
OpenStack does somewhat similar (in OSS arena). Would like to hear
more...
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
---
GTALUG Talk Mailing List - talk@gtalug.org
http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk