snipOn Wed, Dec 18, 2019, 11:16 AM Alvin Starr <alvin@netvel.net> wrote:
On 12/18/19 7:48 AM, Russell Reiter wrote:
Sanction depends on those who control the corporation.Here is a bit of a thought experiment.
Lets say I am interviewing to hire someone.
I ask the person for sexual favors to get the job.
If you are a corporate employee that is grounds for sanction. You expose them to a lawsuit for sexual harassment. If you are a sole or small business proprietor, that's just plain creepy.
It was a bit of an extreme example but how many contracts can be enforced to the detriment of the less powerful party in the contract?
If they say yes then they have accepted my offer and we have a contract.
This kind of agreement is not supported under contract law and the courts are enjoined to respect that fact and they cannot enforce it's terms.
snip
So its a lawful transaction and the person providing the favors has little right to suffer buyers remorse following your logic.
As distasteful as the above example may be, it may still be legal.
The fiduciary obligation is there to the extent of the contract and little more.
A corporation has a fiscal responsibility to shareholders, they have fiduciary obligations to all the person's they contract with.
Really??
So if you believe that the first person you speak to on the phone at Bell,Rogers et al does not have ALL your personal details on the screen in front of them you are sadly mistaken.
I would hope, for billing and service inquiries, they would have all the personal information I provided to them. I wouldn't give my SIN to a phone provider tho. I don't ever remember giving it out to get a landline or cable service and the agents I use now never have asked me for a SIN in order start services.
That's an interesting tidbit.
That is true and this was something like 30 years ago I was much more naive then.
The carrier should have an obligation of care with my information.But the only obligation that the carrier has is to maximize the shareholder value.
Cybercare of personal information starts with the individual, unfortunately it's all downhill from there.
The environment has changed in the intervening time.
When I was a child access to personal information was controlled by physical access to paper and security was a matter of locks and keys.
The rules around information protection are woefully inadequate in today's hyper connected environment.
For example I later this morning will need to start looking at what of my information LifeLabs has leaked.
As you say times have changed. I only recently found out, in the recent past, that they don't even issue replacement SIN cards anymore.
-- Alvin Starr || land: (647)478-6285 Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133 alvin@netvel.net ||