We know its bell's problem because. 1. In spite of my order for analog land line service, noted in writing by Bell accessibility, on March 15, a bell technician installed VoIP here, getting permission from a sighted moving helper, and not speaking with me as the account owner. 2. bell stated in writing that since other disabled customers can use certain technology, I should use the same. 3. Bell first told Teksavy the analog service could be installed, then sent again and again people intent on installing VOIP, because the first tech insisted I could not be living alone, I am blind I could Go on with more examples, like the different stories bell told Teksavy to keep the money flowing until they pulled the plug, but I have likely made my point Karen On Thu, 7 Sep 2023, James Knott via talk wrote:
On 2023-09-07 15:13, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
Reading the original post would remind one that Karen has already had multiple interactions with Bell. Most have been negative, and she has referred to some as "retaliatory". In other words, these paths have been tried and failed.
How do you know it's Bell's problem. All we know is something changed when she moved.
She has had multiple interactions, but were they with that department and not just the normal help(?) line?