Bob,

Thanks for this note -- always glad to have more discussion about this.

I don't know if you remember a Bell Canada commercial from the 80's that featured four businessmen, each in different locations, starting what looked like a teleconference. Ended up, they were actually a barbershop quartet using teleconferencing to hold their practise. You're right, that due to the latency, this really wouldn't work.

However, the plan is the chorus would be in Toronto, and the coach would be in St. Louis, MO -- so the latency wouldn't be a significant factor. I have multiple alternatives to Skype, and the suggestion to use a Rogers Rocket Stick is a great one, so I may go with that.

I really appreciate all of the comments -- thanks again, all!

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Bob Jonkman <bjonkman@sobac.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If you're trying to synchronize singing between different locations
you'll probably find that even the fastest connections have
unacceptable latency. Imagine there's a .1 second lag between you.
When the conductor says "Go" the group in the same location starts
immediately, but the remote group hears "Go" at t=0.1 and by the time
the local group hears the remote group start it's t=0.2 There's no way
to synchronize two choirs in different locations (although someone may
be able to synch separate soundtracks in post-production).

But, you may want to try the Mumble client (or Plumble on an Android
device) using a Murmur server.  Mumble allows you to record each
remote connection separately in its own sound file for post-production
processing.

Mumble /Plumble / Murmur is an audio-only solution, no video. There's
a text chat channel, tho.

- --Bob.

On 2017-04-19 12:08 AM, Alex Beamish via talk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My chorus is thinking about having a coach work with us over a
> Skype connection, with the catch that we rehearse at a church whose
> WiFi we're not allowed to use. (It's complicated.)
>
> It would be possible to use a cell phone as a hotspot, but I'm not
> sure if it would provide enough bandwidth for the call. The
> rehearsal would be about three hours, so at 128kbps (Google's
> answer for Video calling), that would burn through 135M, so about
> 1/7 of my monthly allotment. Then again, video isn't necessarily
> required, and that would cut down the required bandwidth to
> 30kbps.
>
> Are there any alternative products or services that anyone could
> suggest for this type of application?
>
>
>
> --- Talk Mailing List talk@gtalug.org
> https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>

- --


Bob Jonkman <bjonkman@sobac.com>          Phone: +1-519-635-9413
SOBAC Microcomputer Services             http://sobac.com/sobac/
Software   ---   Office & Business Automation   ---   Consulting
GnuPG Fngrprnt:04F7 742B 8F54 C40A E115 26C2 B912 89B0 D2CC E5EA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Ensure confidentiality, authenticity, non-repudiability

iEYEARECAAYFAlj4Du0ACgkQuRKJsNLM5epGagCfaI6pUgTwOW87DsVz9vi5P6zD
1woAmQGhTwnpY2CXW5qM92ZexMPel699
=7Ov7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
Alex Beamish

Baritone, Board Member, Toronto Northern Lights, 2013 Champions / www.northernlightschorus.com
Certified Contest Administrator, Barbershop Harmony Society / www.barbershop.org