I call shenanigans on that perspective.
Given the nature of our group it is
natural that some here will see the issue as merely one of
choice and pace of technology, but IMO it must be seen as a
broader issue of problem-solving. If Karen's accessibility
needs require analog service in 2023, then that service is not
obsolete merely because it's convenient for Bell to declare it
so. In making a transition to digital it is Bell's
responsibility to either:
- provide a complete working solution to Karen's needs
that can be accomplished purely digitally
- use whatever means required internally to maintain (what
is seen in her home as) analog service
Given its regulated monopoly in
last-mile connectivity, the onus is on Bell to provide a
solution to the problem that it caused.