Hi all, I've never considered myself much of a distribution-hopper. Traditionally I would stick with a single distribution for many years until it either folded (Caldera, Mandriva) or made a major decision that drove me away (Mint dropping KDE, Ubuntu inventing snaps). I have almost never gone TO a distribution that was unique in having something that I (think that) I want. I'm on Fedora now because it's safe and stable while being more current in its software than Ubuntu (and by extension Ubuntu-based distros). When I first mentioned Hyprland in August. Ron mentioned (correctly) that its default config is pretty basic, and unlike current GUI tools its configurations are generaly done by editing files under the ~/.config directory. I've been playing with Hyprland under Fedora (with a login-time choice between it and KDE Plasma) and installed some complementary launchers, status bars, etc. To ease the use of Hyprland, a number of people have come forward with instal scripts that would install a list of complementary apps and then install a set of Hyprland config files that would bring these components together into a nice looking system, nearly but not quite a Linux desktop that could replace GNOME, KDE or Cinnamon. And then I came across Omarchy <https://omarchy.org/>. Wow. It's not only a set of FOSS supporting apps and configuration scripts. It builds on top of Weyland and Hyprland to provide the first truly new desktop paradigm I've come across in ages. Far less mouse-dependent, makes heavy use of the "Super" key (which is either ⌘ or ⊞ depending on whether you're on a Mac or PC), very compete and very fast. Plus, its defaults can be easily changed in the config files but wow, what a reference point to start from. I encourage readers here to at least have a look at it, described in loving detail by its creator in this YouTube video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcHY0AEd2Uw>. Problem is.... it only really works well under Arch as it's closely tied to the pacman package manager and other Arch-isms. No other distros are supported. If Omarchy is the killer app that I think it is, I might just try it, which means leaving Fedora after less than a year. So after all that preamble ... my question is here, for anyone who has ever run Arch: Outside of the software-release and installation systems, is there anything significant that I would need to consider if switching? Going from Ubuntu to Fedora was utterly painless, I wonder if Fedora to Arch would be too... Any experiences with Arch, Hyprland or Omarchy are greatly appreciated. - Evan