On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 9:34 AM Steve Litt via Talk <talk@lists.gtalug.org> wrote:

Evan Leibovitch via Talk said on Sun, 17 Aug 2025 02:35:59 -0400

>Non-POSIX-compliant by design, it appears to be far more advanced in
>tab-completion and inline syntax checking than bash.

I saw nothing about POSIX on <https://fishshell.com/> , so what what leads you to say it's non-POSIX compliant?

From their handy (and necessary) guide to bash-to-fish migration:

"Fish is intentionally not POSIX-compatible and as such some of the things you are used to work differently."

- Evan