
I was at SCO Forum this week and viewed some of the disputed code and SCO's explanations both without and with NDA. They have a valid case.
.. so you are stating that the court has accepted their prima facie case? (A valid case is not necessarily a winning one, only one that should be heard. Until a court of valid jurisdiction rules otherwise, SCO's case does appear to be valid insofar as valid means that it should be heard.) Winning it is a completely different matter...
Linux kernel 2.4 to 2.6 contains AIX code which allows scalability beyond that which would have been available in a "regular development timeframe". Anyone interested in a copy of the non-nda PPT let me know and I'll email you a copy. I've tried several postings to the list server but it does'nt seem to be working.
This is a great ploy on SCO's behalf, trying the case in the court of public opinion with a jury that is uninstructed on interpreting the applied laws by a judge from a qualified bench. One of the tenets of law is the "Appearance of Justice"... not that justice can be proven to be done, but that it appears to have been done. Every case has at least one loser. That said, the impact of the case so far is that it is bringing a whole bunch of previously unframed questions about the opensource model that haven't really been addressed by opensource advocacy hype. How strong is the GPL and just how flexible is the code? SCO still has their work cut out for them to get anywhere noteworthy within the legal system with this case. Filing a case <> winning a case. IMHO this case in more noteworthy in how it will set precedence in law about the interpretation and application of the copyright legislation to the specific points of the case rather than the outcome, and how the application of the final judgement will affect future code revisions. I suspect that the basis of the core kernel code is strong enough to survive an unfavorable ruling. The question in my mind is, is the opensource community strong enough to survive the courtcase, winning or losing notwithstanding? -- The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
participants (1)
-
kmastin-PzQIwG9Jn9VAFePFGvp55w@public.gmane.org