On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:09:37 -0500 Fraser Campbell <fraser-Txk5XLRqZ6CsTnJN9+BGXg at public.gmane.org> wrote:

...

I've got someone on another list claiming that Istop users *must* use a "reply-to" setting in their mailer as a matter of policy.

Can any Istop users confirm or deny this?

I doubt they'd try to enforce something quite so ridiculous. I've never talked to their support department except in the first few days when Bell decided to screw with my line. I send my email through their server using my own domain name, have no problems and never use reply-to.

Well, this person is claiming that, due to the fact that IStop uses "a lot of SPAM filtering systems", they have to set a "reply to" or they will somehow "lose e-mail". Setting a "reply-to" for mailing lists is a major headache, and this person refuses to comply with mailing list etiquette. Oh well, whatcha gonna do, there's always one... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro." -- Hunter S. Thompson -- The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml